85 days, 23 hours since parts of the DNS vulnerability were released. Did it impact you yet? Patch now. Please..
NavigationCurrent weatherRaleigh Durham Airport ![]()
Wed, 10/15/2008 - 15:51 Who's Online?Out of 2 registered users there are currently 0 users and 0 guests online.
|
GovernmentThe problem with Al'QaedaSeen on Fark and I can't say it better myself: Here's the problem with Al'Qaeda: It's hard to tell the difference between one of their plots and a drunken delusion. Since 9/11, I remember these great terrorist attempts:
I really don't think these guys are thinking their cunning plans all the way through. In light of that, getting drunk on a plane and claiming to have a bomb really doesn't sound any stupider. You know how baseball teams have "bat day," where the first 5,000 or so fans get a free bat? If the TSA really wanted to be helpful, that's what they'd do. After you pass through a metal detector and baggage X-Ray (with any amount of liquids you like--NO Freedom Baggie requirement), the TSA agent hands you a bat. At the other end of your destination, the TSA agent that just sits there watching people exit the secure area takes your bat. (This limits the number of bats we need to provide, so the program is "green." Folks go for that shiat nowadays.) They'd probably have to make them a bit smaller than regulation size, you know? Maybe like Little-League or T-Ball size or something, so you can still swing it around in the close quarters of an airplane. Now, unless the hijackers outnumber the passengers, anytime someone acts up, all the passengers go to work with their bats, and give the miscreant a wood shampoo. It's like the NRA's claim that "an armed society is a polite society." A plane load of bat-wielding passengers is a plane that's not going to get hijacked. When the terrorist says, "I have a bomb!" what you should really be hearing is,
and by that time the passengers ought to be giving him a wood shampoo anyway. /My lack of terror, let me show you it. Why I'm voting DemocratI'm voting Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending the money I earn than I would. I'm voting Democrat because freedom of speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it. I'm voting Democrat because when we pull out of Iraq I trust that the bad guys will stop what they're doing because they now think we're good people. I'm voting Democrat because I believe that people who can't tell us if it will rain on Friday CAN tell us that the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don't start driving a Prius. I'm voting Democrat because I'm not concerned about the slaughter of millions of babies so long as we keep all death row inmates alive. Fed takes steps to break through credit clogs"As financial companies have racked up multibillion dollar losses on soured mortgage investments and credit problems spread to other areas, firms have hoarded cash and clamped down on lending. That has crimped spending by people and businesses, which in turn has weighed on the national economy -- a vicious cycle the Fed wants desperately to break." By the fed pumping (funny, I originally typed "pimping") money into the system with nothing expected in return, I don't see this "vicious cycle" ever breaking. Oh well. Enjoy it while you can.
A watch list for Alan...I've just returned from a trip to Australia (for work) that brought to light the fact that my name somehow matches an individual that is on a terrorist watch list and "should not be allowed into the United States". I first became aware of this issue as I was delayed at the Singapore Airlines desk at JFK airport as I attempted to obtain a boarding pass for my flight (JFK -> Frankfurt -> Singapore -> Perth). Delta Airlines had already provided me with boarding passes for the entire out-bound trip, but upon my attempt to enter the gate area (passing through security screening), I was told that the kiosk-printed passes were not sufficient and that I would have to return to the Singapore Airlines counter. |
SearchEarthquakes |